The Next BIG thing?

[The Bondsman]

Just had to share this ad with you all. . Loved the heading ...."The Next Big Thing In Underwear"!
Notice it claims that it's "the only underwear that allows a man to hang as nature intended"!
Now you've got to admit it's a fairly full-on pic for an underwear ad.
Sure beats the hell out of those airbrushed flattened Ken-doll mounds we used to get in my youth, ...when I was relying on underwear catalogues for my solo teenage one-handed reading material, doesn't it? ;)
Anyway, should you want 'em, they cost $44.95 Aus.
Nice, ....but no fly dammit, and I reckon that would make access rather difficult, ...but OH what a detailed bulge! :D

[scootmanca]

Looks interesting.. do you own a pair? If, so.. we need to see a pic. wearing them.. ;-)

[Hardhardmate]

Thanks for post Bondsman, have ordered a couple of pairs and will let you know how they turn out, and what they do for me!

[coldshower]

they look very similar to n2n underwear only n2n are much less expensive!

[TryTheseOn]

Statistics say that 80% of men do not use the fly, so why would manufacturers worry about the extra cost for so many that don't use them?

[billys1]

Sorry but count me in the remaining 20%.

[The Bondsman]

Statistics say that 80% of men do not use the fly, so why would manufacturers worry about the extra cost for so many that don't use them?
Doesn't surprise me at all!
About 80% of the flys on underwear are TOTALLY useless, and SO difficult and time consuming to even attempt to use, that any man would have either pissed himself, or given up before achieving anything near manoeuvring his cock out the tiny convoluted openings!
This particularly applies to so much so-called "designer" underwear.
And when so much of the stuff now is so low-rise as to resemble a rubber band around your hips, you cock virtually flops "over-the-top" all by itself!
In the boxerbriefs above in my post, there is quite a long rise between the pouch and the waistband, which would be up under the second waistband of your trousers if you were actually wearing them as underwear. After opening your zipper, you would certainly have to do quite a bit of fishing around to get your member out to either piss, or have anything else done to it.
Personally, I hate having to undo my zip, undo my belt, undo the top button in the waist of my jeans, lift up my shirt and hold down the waistband of my underwear to do something as simple and quick as taking a piss! It takes away one of the best advantages of being a man, and reduces us to the complicated and lengthy operations women have to go through when they need to urinate.
Hence, ......put in a useful, functional fly.
Besides, any guy here who doesn't immediately recognise the very interesting and highly erotic potential of having a fly front opening in a pair of men's underwear should hand in his "underwear lovers" card immediately! :D :D :D

[coldshower]

I rarely use the fly, over the top unless i'm wearing boxer briefs.

[SweatyAussie]

As far as I am concerned, the purpose of a fly, whether consisting of zips or buttons, is to fasten the pants prior to doing up the final button. It's been a long time since I bothered trying to manouevre my member out through the fly rather than simply undoing the top button and unzipping all the way. I had almost forgotten that some guys still do that. :)

[tom]

Thanks to a very generous swop I am just testing out ye olde Y-front Jockies which I last wore at school (not the same pair !!) so the fly is still quite a novelty after aeons of wearing bikini briefs.

However, the spare acreage of material which seems to stretch nearly up to me tits seems a little excessive in a sort of reversed sagger way :eek:

Now, thinks, could this be the reason my mother used to buy them for me when I was at school since one pair of full cut Y-fronts would easily double as a body warmer in winter :rolleyes:

[The Bondsman]

Well, even though it's a very tightly cropped pic tom, I for one think you look great in 'em! I'd like to see FAR more shots of you in them, ...and I'm betting quite a few others here would too!
Jockey Classics have a masculine sexiness that transcends current fashion trends, and tend to look good on any guy who wears them in a confident fashion. They don't call 'em "Classics" for nothing!
Remember, the original purpose of "underwear" was to prevent your very expensive clothing from touching your body and getting sweaty/greasy.
( Dry-cleaners hadn't been invented in the dark ages, and all that velvet and brocade was certainly not wash-and-wear!)
"Linen", could be washed far more easily.
Therefore the tiny, very brief underwear we see today is actually a very modern concept, and not really very functional for the purpose.
It does of course have "shock" value when it's worn under a business suit or the like.
There are some VERY sexy pics of guys wearing Jockey Classics here in the galleries, ...and they have always attracted very admiring comments, specially from ME!

[tom]

The reason why I don't is I feel I'm getting a bit too heavy and I never know what to do with me arms!!!

Maybe it's must be the post Xmas stomach.. as after all one must try to stay trim and nubile :rolleyes:

But as it's just you dwarling who will be viewing it, I'll show you a little more - sadly one of these is just a web cam cam pic... I promise to do better!

[The Bondsman]

I simply don't remember seeing any rules on this site that stated posters MUST be possessed of a Calvin Klein model type body, ....did I miss something?
In that is the case deuSex had better make with the delete button in MY gallery immediately!
The "underwear fetish gene" does not necessarily come with the "body-beautiful" component, ....so let's both just post away.
I think you look great in all your shots, and in Jockey Classics?
Well I for one would be more than delighted to find them on you if I got the chance to remove your pants! ;) :D

[tom]

Right then Mr B, I have just for you (and my own pleasure :hump: ) exhausted myself during the making of my latest cockbuster video "White Jockeys the Vibrating Movie.." but, am still tryng to make space to post it... very soon I hope!

But, in the course of this marathon I did mange to take a quite few pics of the aforsaid Jockeys showing my sylph body so just for you here are a couple to get you started.

I hope I might have bit of space for posting more of these left on the gallery after I have got the vid up and running.

:blowme:

[The Bondsman]

Well I DO hope you're not ENTIRELY exhausted after the making of your "cockbuster" video, .....love that title!, .....'cos I can hardly wait to see it.
My,My, YOU have been having "fun" when you're left "home alone", haven't you?
The teaser shots look great, so I'm sitting here in MY Jockey Classics ready to go! :hump

[tom]

Mr B, you will be orgasmitized to learn that I have master(bat)ed the vid posting software and posted the dreaded vid, albeit in two parts as it was rather large (if only) along with a few pics of the (no longer) so tighty whities :moon:

[The Bondsman]

AHHH! The lengths guys will go to to please me and my fetish for white Jockey Classics!
VERY much appreciated tom, .....you not only wear 'em well, but know what to do in 'em too!
Judging by the comments left in the galleries about guys who post pics wearing Jockey Classics, there are so many lovers of these briefs here, perhaps we should have a thread/competition based around this basic brief, and the creative ways wearers can photograph/present them?
I have a few ideas along those lines myself! ;)

[tom]

I'd go for that, you would be amazed at where I can stick my long lense :)

[The Bondsman]

I'd go for that, you would be amazed at where I can stick my long lens :)
Well I certainly knew YOUR answer wouldn't be "negative", .....and as you're fully "developed", and not yet too "over-exposured", it would only be a matter of "time" before you get up to some "digital" manipulation in some "dark-room" to see just what "develops"!
I'd go for a "brief-exposure" of course, but then I am fond of guys who's nickname happens to be "tripod", and are not afraid to "pose" with the "shutters" open....a "positive" turn-on!

[tom]

This is getting "harder" to "cum" "up" with an original repost since you have "swallowed" "up" all the best double entendre when you "came "up" with your previous post.

I shall have to get out my "150mm" lense and see what I can "come" "up" with, although strangely with the thought of "shooting" my hands shake if I use anything "bigger" these days, but that it might just be the "screw" fitting that's loose.

I must go now, I have to check my "aperature" to be sure I can get it all "in"..

[ballucanb]

I will be Cumming back to see what you Cum up with...B

[billys1]

This is getting "harder" to "cum" "up" with an original repost since you have "swallowed" "up" all the best double entendre when you "came "up" with your previous post.

I shall have to get out my "150mm" lense and see what I can "come" "up" with, although strangely with the thought of "shooting" my hands shake if I use anything "bigger" these days, but that it might just be the "screw" fitting that's loose.

I must go now, I have to check my "aperature" to be sure I can get it all "in"..
:eek: :blowme ;) :moon
cum on you guys. give me a break. :eek: :eek: :eek: you are keeping me hard with your banter :hump

lovit and ya all just the samen. :shocked :D :p

[ballucanb]

HARD, I thought thats why I was here, I cum by every chance I get.

Your doing a grand job, thanks....B

[billys1]

This is getting "harder" to "cum" "up" with an original repost since you have "swallowed" "up" all the best double entendre when you "came "up" with your previous post.

I shall have to get out my "150mm" lense and see what I can "come" "up" with, although strangely with the thought of "shooting" my hands shake if I use anything "bigger" these days, but that it might just be the "screw" fitting that's loose.

I must go now, I have to check my "aperature" to be sure I can get it all "in"..
OH TOM,

please never never quit finding places to put that "long" lense of yours. ooohhhh. please, I;ll help find some mew ones. ok?

billys1 :blowme :moon :hump :) :D :eek: :blowme :moon

[jmother]

I'm not big in boxers and shorts, but this one is really tempting. Too bad Australia is so far from Europe.

[tom]

This thread can only get worse !

[ballucanb]

Well I hope so, I keep cumming back to see what developes...B

[man2man82]

hi...I'm new here. Im crazy about underwear and this forum got me crazy too. Thanks for all the underwear info.

Love,
man2man82
http://man2man4u.blogspot.com

[jmother]

I could not resist and got a pair. They're absolutely fabulous to wear. Here's a first pic.
This is the "Fitted" model. It gives slightly more support than the "Comfort" model that sparked this interesting ;) side conversation on the fly-no fly theme.

[The Bondsman]

Well jmother, let me be the first to say that you fill them out to perfection.
A while ago in this thread above you said ...and I quote, ..."I'm not big in boxers and shorts".
Let me beg to differ, ....you look HUGE!