Tight underwear under low-rise jeans

[lycrathong]

How do other guys cope if wearing tight underwear under low-rise jeans, and you need to visit a public toilet/washroom? My jeans have only 2" zips so there is no way I can manoeuvre my cock out of there. I have to unzip my jeans and lower them part way so I can get my cock out of my briefs.

Would you do the same, or take the easy way and go into a cubicle?

[ballucanb]

Iam a cubical guy myself, but thats the only way, with lo rise jeans, I wore them in the sixties, didn't like them then...

[SweatyAussie]

Maybe I am missing something here, but what is the problem with unzipping the things all the way? I always do this, it's second nature now, it's far less bother than having to wangle my dick out of a small opening. You are prepared to stand there and piss in view of another guy for goodness sake, so what is the issue with unzipping the jeans and rolling them down a little?
Sorry if I seem to be a bit emotional over this, and I am sure the following does not apply to you... but I am getting irritated at the number of guys these days who go into a cubicle and close the door when all they want to do is piss, instead of using a perfectly good urinal. They seem to be saying "I'm too good to use the urinal like the rest of you, I demand privacy". Not to mention the fact that flushing the toilet uses a lot more water than your standard urinal, something of which we should all be conscious in these days of conservation awareness.

[ballucanb]

Hell most of the time I wear addias nylon pants, I have no need to un-zip, I just drop-em, and pull my member out and piss, I am one of those piss shy guys, I have trouble getting this going with an audiance, I have but it takes some time, and you know people are waiting in line to get in.....

[SweatyAussie]

Hell most of the time I wear addias nylon pants, I have no need to un-zip, I just drop-em, and pull my member out and piss, I am one of those piss shy guys, I have trouble getting this going with an audiance, I have but it takes some time, and you know people are waiting in line to get in.....
No they're not. They are waiting behind you to get a perve at those tight nylon pants.

[The Bondsman]

Now SweatyAussie, ....there are indeed guys who for some reason suffer "performance anxiety" :eek: when faced with a public urinal.
Not me I'm glad to say, but I do enjoy one of the advantages of being a man, and that's the one of being able to take a quick and easy piss when nature demands.
Hence my oft-repeated rant against flys in briefs/underwear that are just not practical, too small, too complicated or merely decorative at best. And then there's those quite high-waisted boxerbriefs with no fly, too high up under your pants waist to reach from your zipper opening ..... so you have to go to the urinal, unzip your jeans, undo the button at the top of your jeans,pull your jeans down aways, hold up your shirt, pull down your boxerbriefs, hold everything in place, get your dick out with any spare hand you may have left and make sure you don't piss on any of your flapping around clothing. after getting the piss taken, and the obligatory few shakes,then you have to stand there and re-assemble the whole elaborate kaboodle!
What a pain! It's as bad as the whole rigmarole women have to go through on their communal toilet visits!
No, give me a pair of pants easy to open and a damn good functional fly, at the correct level, and I'm out and done and back in in no time flat. No fuss, no mess, and no embarrassing dribbles. I can even do it outdoors if necessary.
And on another level, .....should you ever wish to .....to......ahem,. .....inspect the "credentials" of another guy in a hurry and privacy is not guaranteed, then who the hell wants to be searching and groping around some equivalent of a damn blind obstacle course behind the guy's zipper? Do I go up? How far up? Down? To the side? Is he already too hard to get it out comfortably for him? Do I try to fully lower his jeans :moon and underwear and risk being caught in the act?
As I am one of those underwear lovers who likes to actually incorporate my underwear AND the underwear of my partner (always a turn-on), into the sexual act, then access is certainly a priority for that too, not just for pissing.
Don't know about over there, but the extreme low-waisted jeans here have just about gone the same way as Brittney Spears, and we are definitely seeing some slightly higher waists coming back. Now if we could only get rid of that virulent pestilence imported from the USA of those damn ugly half mast, baggy arsed, "cargo-pocketed" LONG so-called "shorts"(???). How many more seasons must we endure this stupid un-flattering look that turns every guy into a turkey, carrying a clutch of eggs at each knee? :mad:
AND I CAN'T SEE "LEGS"!!! :mad: :mad: :mad:

[ballucanb]

Well I have been looking, for one of those lookers, and no luck yet, I am sorry to say, and I agree on those baggy pants, when your young and have a great body, why would you hide it under those ugly pants.

You know as most of these guys get older there body's got to S**t, and they have one time in there lives to look good and they are hideing in those ugly, looks like the back of an elephant pants..., I am old, and kids wore good looking, show your body off pants, when i was younger, but the pants actully fit the wearer, Today all the fat people are hideing in those pants, but unfortunatly, so are the good loking bodies, what a waste....

[The Bondsman]

when your young and have a great body, why would you hide it under those ugly pants. Today all the fat people are hideing in those pants, but unfortunatly, so are the good loking bodies, what a waste....
Certainly agree with all you say ballucanb, and even those guys who have made the effort to keep in shape as they get older(yum), are wearing such baggy stuff they might as well have been "super-sized" at Macca's every day!
Has political correctness gone so far, or is everyone in the USA SO overweight, (don't worry, Australia is apparently coming second!), that fashion has to bend to the demands of the grossly over-weight?
We have had those same damn pants here every season for at least 10 years!
Now, when you go out to a bar, it's like being in ill-fitted camo-fatigues at some Iraqi army base! Camo for KS, how long can that endure? I know gays have always dressed in the iconic, but this is just ridiculous!
I thought we were supposed to be more "creative", but the designers are stuck in one helluva rut.
I know Ghetto-kulcha doesn't do "fitted" for men, ....only for the ho's and bitches, but enough of the over-size crap already!
I harbour a strong love of men's legs/thighs and butts, but I defy anyone to even see these parts now, ....and that sagging down, baggy, empty-arsed, round the knees look is just SAD, SAD, SAD !
(Here endeth the rant, ...for now!)

[lycrathong]

Well, I still fit into tight 30" waist jeans at 59......

[SweatyAussie]

Has political correctness gone so far, or is everyone in the USA SO overweight, (don't worry, Australia is apparently coming second!), that fashion has to bend to the demands of the grossly over-weight?
....

I know Ghetto-kulcha doesn't do "fitted" for men, ....only for the ho's and bitches, but enough of the over-size crap already!
Bondsman I am sure it will not surprise you to know that I totally agree.

I am not sure whether it's political correctness or whether the fashion industry is merely mass-producing for the lowest common denominator - or in this case the fattest. I have had endless discussions about this on jeans sites. Remember, clothing manufacturers are not charities, they are in it to maximise their profits. You and I may not like this but we have to live with it. The best we can do is to keep on wearing what we really like wearing (once we can locate it) and give positive feedback to others who look good in their gear.

Back in the 1970's there was a wonderful fashion called body-shirts. These are spoken of with a snigger these days - mostly by those who know that they themselves would look ridiculous in one. For those who don't know, these were proper business-style shirts that could be worn with a tie at the office (if you were unlucky enough to work somewhere that required a tie), but could also be smart casual wear. They were made of cotton combined with something that made tham slightly stretchy, and they were tapered so that someone with a big chest could wear one and tuck it into their pants without having the material fold over on itself in the manner of curtains coming down at interval time at the theatre. I had a blue one that I wore at my first full-time office job back in 1971, and was still using it until my last office job in 2003. Appropriately, the stitching ripped on my last day on the job!

[MarkD]

About the guys who use stalls vs urinals to pee????? Lets not forget the homo-phobes out there!!! God forbid someone gets a glimpes of your dick!!!

[The Bondsman]

Back in the 1970's there was a wonderful fashion called body-shirts. These are spoken of with a snigger these days - mostly by those who know that they themselves would look ridiculous in one. For those who don't know, these were proper business-style shirts that could be worn with a tie at the office (if you were unlucky enough to work somewhere that required a tie), but could also be smart casual wear. They were made of cotton combined with something that made tham slightly stretchy, and they were tapered so that someone with a big chest could wear one and tuck it into their pants without having the material fold over on itself in the manner of curtains coming down at interval time at the theatre.
I always thought they looked HOT! They were the ones that were broad in the shoulders, but were tapered down to a very attractive waist, weren't they? The made the most of a guy's good body shape.
The only reason they are sniggered at now is the very real fact that most men these days would need their shirts to taper the OTHER WAY!
I am old enough to remember the worst insult one could deliver to a guy was to say the arse of his jeans hung down!
Everybody prided themselves on having a cute butt and perfectly fitted pants/jeans to show it off. Even women still say it is their favourite part of a man's anatomy, ....and they certainly aren't the Lone Ranger there, I can tell you!
Now? ...Well who the hell can see any guy's arse, or even determine if he's actually got one? The crutch of the pants is down between the knees, and there's just nothing at all in the "poop-catching" baggy sack at the back.
If there's one "look" I am SO over, and just can't abide any more, it's the GROSSLY oversize T-shirt( usually with some crappy sportswear logo such as Adidas/Nike or like), HUGE voluminous half-masted pants hanging down to 6" above the ankles, ....and it's often topped off with a parka that appears to have been made out of an over-padded double bed doona. This outfit is guaranteed to appear to visually put about 50lbs. to any figure.
It is now at least possible to buy tighter T-shirts here, and jeans that DO fit you in the bum. I have worked damn hard on this bod,(I can still wear my school pants), as have many other guys here, (congrats to all of you!), and I certainly ain't gonna hide it under so much extra baggage that I look like a moving beach-ball! :D
I don't want to be Kylie Minogue with my arse-cheeks hangin out, BUT I do want shorts that are actually shorts,(i.e, above the knee-cap and fitted in the seat), .... NOT oversized long pants that have been left to long in the dryer on full heat!
What's the point in the hot climate here of wearing "shorts", if they are indistinguishable from slightly shrunken long pants?
How long has Michael Jordan been pensioned off now? :confused:

[SweatyAussie]

I always thought they looked HOT! They were the ones that were broad in the shoulders, but were tapered down to a very attractive waist, weren't they? The made the most of a guy's good body shape.... (there's more, much more, but you can read it on the original posting)

Wow! Yes to all that. The shorts, the shirts, the pants, the lot. I couldn't have said it better myself. More succinctly maybe, but not better. :)

Re Kylie: Her arse is about the only thing that I DO like about her. I liked the comment from Justin Timberlake who said "On a scale of 1 to 10, her ass(sic) rates about 58." Given his record of accidentally-on-purpose causing female wardrobe malfunctions, I would advise Kylie to keep well away from him, especially at large public events.

[The Bondsman]

I couldn't have said it better myself. More succinctly maybe, but not better. :)
Ouch! Point taken. ;) Will try to curb my verbal effluvia in future!