PDA

View Full Version : hiding-erection underpant based on pelvic protecot


suggestor
01-28-2007, 06:31 AM
I suggest that someone would develop underpants that hide the erection.
The design should be based on pelvic protector.
Jockstrap is too noticeable when you wear it, and people might think you have erection even if you dont, but the pelvic protector is more flat.
I think many teenagers and men who suffer from erection in public would buy this product.
take care,please contact me in e-mail forum28@walla.com

Hans

ballucanb
01-28-2007, 10:49 AM
I think you have to use the age old, cure, stay seated, when I was in school, sometimes this didn't work, like changeing classes, and being called on, worst yet, having to go to the board.

I guess there is no cure for being young and horney, only the obvious, and you can't do that right there.

SweatyAussie
01-28-2007, 11:15 PM
I suggest that someone would develop underpants that hide the erection.
The design should be based on pelvic protector.
Jockstrap is too noticeable when you wear it, and people might think you have erection even if you dont, but the pelvic protector is more flat.
I think many teenagers and men who suffer from erection in public would buy this product.
take care,please contact me in e-mail forum28@walla.com

Hans

I think it's a bit sad that society has got to the stage where a natural human function such as getting an erection - and one that is often involuntary at that - is regarded as a reason for embarrassment.

Still, if you find it's a problem, I suggest a thong or a jockstrap. They may show a noticeable bulge (could be more in your own mind) but so what? I find that while they may show a bulge (terrible problem that), they do not actually show the outline of the dick, and that is probably the important thing if such things bother you. People might think you have an erection when you don't, sure... and people might think you're a mass murderer when you're not, that's their issue not yours.

P.S. What is this with guys saying reply to an email address? Nothing doing. No reason I should not share my thoughts with the rest of the members here.

jmother
01-29-2007, 12:52 AM
I think it's a bit sad that society has got to the stage where a natural human function such as getting an erection - and one that is often involuntary at that - is regarded as a reason for embarrassment.

I'm with you there!.. and actually don't really mind showing a bulge under my pants (trousers in the UK).

The Bondsman
01-29-2007, 02:01 AM
I do find it sad, and more than a little ironic, that you are worried about showing a perfectly natural erection, when billions of dollars are being spent on drugs like viagra by men desperate to induce the very same response!
Enjoy your normal bodily function, ...and be very thankful that it happens spontaneously.
Me? I couldn't care less who notices if it's "full mast", .........I enjoy the outward signs of arousal. There's nothing more uncomfortable (and almost painful), than being strapped down when nature says "UP!"
Besides, erections are very contagious, .....and I just LOVE spreading the symptoms to other men! ;) ;) ;)

superdoc
01-29-2007, 06:38 AM
Hard on! Bondsman!

ballucanb
01-29-2007, 10:44 AM
Yes its true its a natural body function, but when your a teen in school, it's quite embarrasing, when you were younger, just after pubertiy set in, no one notices, but junior high or high school is a different story.

You are young and don't know what to think, I though I was,the only one, at that age, after all it was the late 50's when I started getting erections, and no one talked about anything, and my family wasn't the sort that talked about things like that, so I was left to my own conclusions...

SweatyAussie
01-29-2007, 01:58 PM
Reminds me of the first time I masturbated to ejaculation. No one had ever told me about white stuff coming out the end of your dick.
Fortunately it was not long after that that my confusion was cleared up at the school "Father and Son night". These days I think most parents are more open - and rightly so. To not tell children about basic matters of sex borders on criminal negligence.

ballucanb
01-29-2007, 07:39 PM
That left me a bit confused, it took quite awhile for me to find out, just what was happening, all I knew, I liked it, and did it as much as I could...before you get to worried, these are only reading glasses....B

tom
02-10-2007, 05:17 AM
Yes, as Ballucanb says, having boners at that sort of age and praying nobody would see or worse, comment :eek: Oh, it was a most embarrassing time.

Yet, as I recall, sitting there with my regulation (14 year old) stiffie and looking around it seemed all boys had one - which in turn, probably accounted for the fact why the bottom edge of the desk was so polished ;)

I think maybe that could have been the only advantage of the dreaded Y-fronts we wore, in that there was plenty of room for expansion and even a hand or two inside, under the slack elastic... it's no wonder they were shapeless :D

If only I could have my time again, but knowing what I know now :rolleyes:

The Bondsman
02-10-2007, 08:29 PM
Reminds me of the first time I masturbated to ejaculation. No one had ever told me about white stuff coming out the end of your dick..
You know SweatyAussie, that little phenomena surprised the hell out of me too!
I had been wanking for a while, and found the feeling most enjoyable, and really thought that that was probably it, ...when suddenly, one night, the eyes rolled back in the head :eek:, my body started to jerk and all this white stuff erupted out of my rock hard cock, ...making a hell of a mess too I can tell you!
I think I probably had a vague idea that something came out, but in my innocence, thought it might be akin to pee-ing.
I really wasn't sure just what had happened, ......perhaps I'd "broke" it? Did I need medical attention?
Mind you, I was only 11, nearly twelve, and certainly didn't reckon with the force or the quantity of the ejaculation.
Mind you, this little incident certainly did not stop any further activities, .....I just made sure I had a handkerchief or some such to catch the flying population-paste! I reckon I could have inseminated the entire female population with my throwaways if I had been so inclined!
Then the "wet-dreams" set in, and necessitated the wearing of briefs or my jockstrap to bed to "save" the sheets, ....which set off even more fervent activities! ;) Underwear AND sex, ...two things forever locked together in my psyche!
It's a wonder my dick had any skin left on it!

superdoc
02-10-2007, 09:51 PM
And, apparently, you did not go blind, etc? :bath :bath :bath

loinclothtim
02-10-2007, 09:54 PM
I had a problem with erections when I was a teenager. I would often have to get up from sitting holding a book or my hands in front of my dick. I had this terror of being seen which was probably a waste of energy as it probably would have brightened up somebody's day.

I would avoid any situation like swimming or changing in locker rooms where I would be seen in underpants or speedos as there would be nothing I could do if I started to get hard. Gym lessons were a nightmare as all we wore were loose white shorts, and of course the showers presented another obstacle.

One particular fear was that I would be made to go on stage in a play or a musical or something like that, wearing only tight pants or a loincloth or whatever. I remember a production of the play Lord of the Flies where the boys were almost naked for part of the time! I don't think it would be done today.
I never did have to expose my body or wear tight underwear in public buit it was a constant worry.

The Bondsman
02-10-2007, 11:09 PM
And, apparently, you did not go blind, etc? :bath :bath :bath
You think these dark glasses are for the sun???
:cool: Just mind you don't step on my labrador, ...or break my white cane! :D

tom
02-11-2007, 04:54 AM
I had a problem with erections when I was a teenager. I would often have to get up from sitting holding a book or my hands in front of my dick. I had this terror of being seen which was probably a waste of energy as it probably would have brightened up somebody's day.

I would avoid any situation like swimming or changing in locker rooms where I would be seen in underpants or speedos as there would be nothing I could do if I started to get hard. Gym lessons were a nightmare as all we wore were loose white shorts, and of course the showers presented another obstacle.

Loinclothtim, you put all that so well, I couldn't have done it better myself, so if we add that to Ballucamb's post and I think it just sums up our school days beautifully.

By the way I used know boy called Tim at school, he used to wear those cellular briefs (I know that 'cause I used to look :rolleyes: )... you wouldn't be him would you ;) I'll bet you are really glad you found this site :eek:

aussie-boy
02-15-2007, 05:55 AM
Theyre called Stiffies Underwear - were on the Australian show "the new inventors" 2 years ago (u never know, video might still be on www.abc.net.au)

Website is www.stiffiesunderwear.com and they are a boxer-brief with a pouch in the front

SweatyAussie
02-15-2007, 07:22 AM
Flies carry disease. Keep yours buttoned.


Besides, erections are very contagious, .....and I just LOVE spreading the symptoms to other men! ;) ;) ;)

SweatyAussie
02-15-2007, 11:43 AM
Theyre called Stiffies Underwear - were on the Australian show "the new inventors" 2 years ago (u never know, video might still be on www.abc.net.au)

Unless I am misreading their website, Stiffies seem to be aiming their product at the guy who wants to show off his equipment - which is the opposite to what the guy wanted who started this thread.
I've said it before and I'll say it again... I have no wish to hide the fact that I am a guy, but on the other hand nor do I particularly want to pretend that I have something I don't down there. If I get an erection, the rest of the world has to live with that, it's a natural human function.
To the guys who reveal their fear of displaying an erection as a child, that's OK, if everyone around you seems to suggest that anything to do with sex was naughty or evil, naturally some of the attitude will rub off. What I want to hear, though, is that you guys have moved on from this time and are now comfortable with your own bodies and how they work. Otherwise we are going to perpetuate the cycle of guilt via the next generation of children.

SmoothChris
02-17-2007, 12:02 PM
I find it a bit sad that anyone should be described as 'suffering from erections'. I can understand how it happens, when a prudish society refuses to accept that erection even happens, let alone that any sign of it might be seen. When I was a teenager I used to have erections all the time, as did other boys, and my recollection is that they were very difficult to hide when we all wore loose, non-restrictive underwear. I guess I was lucky, being at a boys' boarding school where a bulge in your pants was not something anyone ever frowned at or commented on. The problem - at least to begin with - was at gym. We had a lovely gym with a sprung maple floor, so everyone went barefoot. In fact the only clothing allowed was a pair of gym shorts. These were made of very light unlined cotton, very short and cut at the sides. If your cock was erect, it stood out like a flagpole, and sometimes escaped altogether. We were very embarrassed to begin with until our gym master - who was an ex-army PT instructor, told us that it was perfectly natural for boys to have erections, and it was just nature's way of giving the penis a 'workout'. He told us that we should be proud of our bodies, and our three times weekly gym sessions were aimed at giving us something to be proud of. He wanted to see no laughing, commenting or sniggering about erections, because they were a sign of virility, not inadequacy. From then on we just took an erect cock as something normal, and gym sessions were a great place to see them!
:)

SweatyAussie
02-25-2007, 02:03 PM
In our high school PE classes (as they were then called, don't know what they call them now), one of the activities was rope-climbing. (I was one of the few who could climb the rope all the way up and descend without using legs, only hands. :D ) For some reason the push-pulling action as one climbs seems to have a sexually stimulating effect, and I know that some of the boys used to "crack a fat" as they climbed (an old-fashioned slang, but one that I think is coming back). Then of course, since most of them had the rope between their legs, it rubbed against their erection, which (a) got them even harder, and (b) tended to squash things that were not held securely in position.

I remember one of the boys saying to the others that he was wearing a pair of tight speedos under his shorts "so my tool won't get squashed". This was the first time I had heard of actually wearing speedos as underwear. Later on of course I found that sometimes it's very practical. Certainly it was a better alternative for gym wear than the stupid loose cotton briefs that were all that were available at the time.

tom
03-01-2007, 05:28 PM
Gawd, I never climbed up but always managed to stay at the bottom checking "things" out :rolleyes:

Newbie2it
03-03-2007, 02:35 AM
Gawd, I never climbed up but always managed to stay at the bottom checking "things" out :rolleyes:

LOL Tom, I like your thinking. We didnt have rope climbing in my highschool, which was an all boys Prep seminary. <I wish I stayed in highschool now>

Anyhow, I was never a big athletic fan for running and such, so during gym class we had two options. Participate in the class or go to the weight room and work out. I think they figured that if you didnt feel strong enough to participate, you might as well work out so you could.

I always chose the weight room. I'd generally sit by the windows in the cramp little weight room which was directly at the foot of the weight bench :) The views were spectacular, and I am not refering to out the window. Tho I do admit, my favorite place was the locker room when all of us had to go shower :bath

superdoc
03-03-2007, 06:02 PM
When I was in high school, during gym, I was allowed to quit early to tend to the locker room. Man, I was in heaven! I saw jocks, underwear most everywhere. I even manned the supply of jocks. I had a good time in the shower and even wore my underwear into the shower. I usually found some dry ones in the supply that I wore home and placed my wet ones in my gym bag. Sometimes, I would wear something from the supply into the shower. And I got to see all the guys in their briefs, which was what everyone wore those days. :bath :bath :bath :bath :bath

acam
03-23-2007, 05:10 PM
When I was young I had the same problem. When I learned to wear a jockstrap, erections were far from obvious if the penis was pointing up beforehand. So I find it odd to see so many pictures of people wearing the penis pointing down. Your solution is altogether too tight for comfort. Many people say that a jockstrap is also uncomfortable when worn for long periods rather than just for sports or gymnastics. It used to be when the only jockstap avaiable (in the UK) was the old "Litesome" which used to begin by being uncomfortably tight and had the elastic at each side of the pouch tight enough to feel as if it was cutting into you after an hour or two. Litesomes became quite comfortable when 'worn in' but it took a while.
Nowadays there are many more choices and many comfortable jockstraps. The main difficulty is finding models that fit high enough on the waist (so that an erect penis doesn't push against the waistband). The hipster style is a disaster from this point of view. I thought I had found the solution some years ago with 'Le Jock' (later Le Jaques) but they went out of business three or four years ago.

I have worn almost no underwear but a jockstrap for the last fifty years and although I might be much less embarassed now by an erection I'm also much less likely to have one. [Incidentally I also usually wear lycra running tights instead of trousers and am old enough to get away with it!]

acam

Lovehom
03-24-2007, 01:49 PM
I am wearing a Hom jockstrap right now and have been all day (i.e. about 10 hours now). I walked 2 miles or so each way into town and back wearing it and it is still comfortable now. I agree the old Litesome can cut in badly unless you wear a size or so larger. Also the material is not so soft on the cock etc.
At school I mainly wore Y-fronts, so the bulge when I got a hard-on was not too noticeable. Many boys in those days (late 50's) still wore the old type loose white trunks, which don't hold or support at all. I kept a spare pair of tight Y's to wear under my gym shorts, so no problem there.
Lovehom

sharako
05-28-2007, 09:31 PM
i wish i had more erections i never get any spontaneous ones and im 21 :( so when i get it i show it off ^^

AZTanDan
11-04-2007, 10:54 AM
I suggest that someone would develop underpants that hide the erection.

Good God Why??? :confused:

The male erection whether at full or halfstaff is a glorious site to behold. One doesn't go around telling a woman wearing a particularly tight t-shirt or sweater to put on a bra that hides or controls her hardened nipples. Most guys (even some gay ones that I know) enjoy the view. The same applies to the male member... I hate double standards... It's ok for women to wear dental floss for bathing suits, but men must wear bored shorts, it's ok for women to walk around with rock hard nipples, but men must tether their members in such a way as to not offend.... Bull!

When I look at a man's crotch I want to see something bulging... If I wanted to see unobtrusive nothingness, I will stare at a woman's crotch instead.