PJ's

[Nij]

A little section for pyjama bottoms would be great. Not underwear I know but a man just in pyjama bottoms is really sexy.

[ballucanb]

I don't know all my pajamas have feet attached, they are more for comfort, than sexy....

[dayne]

Great idea! It dould replace the section of men in woman's underwear :D Strictly my opinion.

[Ogden]

Feel free to post any pictures you have, of course. Nothing says you can't include both underwear and pajamas in a photo series.

[SweatyAussie]

Yeah... let's have pyjamas. And why stop there - how about bathrobes, kaftans, business suits, raincoats... :rolleyes:

Sorry but I find pyjamas totally unsexy. More to the point, they have little or nothing to do with the underwear fetish.

[deusex]

It's cool that you have a pajama fetish, but this is an underwear site and it's important that it retains it's focus.

In fact we're in the process of developing some more precise rules for the galleries to help maintain that focus.

Not sure if you all have noticed it, but there are many people who stretch the rules to post photos of what ever they want (i.e. fucking photos, photos of their gaping assholes, full on nudity - and the underwear is hardly noticeable.)

Some of you may think we're being picky in enforcing these new set of rules, but if it keeps going the way it is, then there is no point calling this an underwear site and just another generic adult site, and I know of 1000000 places I can go to see completely naked men.

We'll let you know about the new rules shortly...

[The Bondsman]

Full on respect and support deusex!
This is undoubtably the best underwear site on the net, and I will support serious measures taken to keep it that way. Sure we all may have other fetishes as well as "men's underwear", ...BUT this is NOT the place to air them.
The site cannot be all things to all men.
We stretch it now to include swimwear, which is not specifically underwear at all,...if we start to include pyjamas, running shorts, cock rings, tights, women's panties, women's swimsuits, complete nudity, shaving shots, etc, etc. and so forth, not only will the site become unwieldy, but the original intention and concept of the site will change, and men's underwear will just become one of the other threads in a long line.
The Internet is VAST, and even I come across sites devoted to the most esoteric of fetishes. Be assured there is a site out there for whatever else, (other than men's underwear), floats your boat. It's just NOT this one!

[Ogden]

While pajamas might not be underwear, we do have a section here for onionskins, etc, as well as the swimwear. I can understand how full nudity devoid of underwear isn't part of the theme, but in my opinion, pajamas are more closely related to underwear than either of those categories. I don't think it's entirely inappropriate, for what it might be worth. :)

It's cool that you have a pajama fetish, but this is an underwear site and it's important that it retains it's focus.

In fact we're in the process of developing some more precise rules for the galleries to help maintain that focus.

Not sure if you all have noticed it, but there are many people who stretch the rules to post photos of what ever they want (i.e. fucking photos, photos of their gaping assholes, full on nudity - and the underwear is hardly noticeable.)

Some of you may think we're being picky in enforcing these new set of rules, but if it keeps going the way it is, then there is no point calling this an underwear site and just another generic adult site, and I know of 1000000 places I can go to see completely naked men.

We'll let you know about the new rules shortly...

[deusex]

Did you ever wonder what USG stood for? This whole site started as a simple guide to places you could buy underwear and swimwear online.

USG = Underwear Swimwear Guide

There's always been in my mind a logical connection between underwear and swimwear and I'm obviously not alone, as most underwear shops also carry swimwear as well.

The onion skin is also very closely related in my mind, as onion skins typically have a lining. Even if it doesn't, it's still skimpy and often offers a glimpse of what is underneat - the same as the allure of underwear for me.

The real point for me is that we're in a process of trying to bring the focus of the site back, so diversifying wouldn't do much to help this process.

[briefman14867]

deusEx, I think you are totally justified. I couldn't say enough good about this site and all your work!

I would say one thing I think would be hot would be a man in pajama pants with underwear showing.

There's an old Connery Bond movie, don't know which one, where he's in bed and there's a tarantula or something idiotic like that that a villain has slipped in his room to kill him (did I already say it was idiotic?) and he gets up (or who knows--maybe I'm totally remembering all this wrong) but what I can VIVIDLY see in my mind is that fucking hot piece of man (maybe he's an asshole, but he was hot in his prime, which for me is about the 70s or 80s, if you agree, you must get Zardoz) at any rate he's got no shirt and these light blue trousers and you can totally see these little white briefs through the thin pajama fabric...

Anyway, if someone wants to post something like THAT here, I think it would be hot. But just PJs, well, I'm with deusEx's decision that it's just off topic.

[briefman14867]

There's an old Connery Bond movie, don't know which one, .

Actually, it's "Dr. No." Worth checking out if you haven't seen it. It's the one where he spends some time on the beach with Ursula Andress (in one scene he's wearing blue trousers, NOT the blue PJs, walking on the beach and you can totally see his dick bulging).

But anyway, back to the point of talking about this in this thread, the PJs with briefs showing through is on Youtube at about min 2:10 of this video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFtcJbbRT6M

[plhcrafter]

:hump Hi guys, plhcrafter here. I don't say much, often but you. hit on a subject near and dear to my heart. I am a pajama freak, and nights shirt to. But, I came to this sight for one thing only. I am a naturist also, but again if I want to stroke those dogs, I will go to a kennel.
Perhaps we should instead, help out those folks and encourage to set up their own sight. I for one would welcome it. I have learned a lot just enjoying this sight, as is.

[SweatyAussie]

:hump ..... if I want to stroke those dogs, I will go to a kennel.

Are you sure you don't mean stroke the monkey?

[plhcrafter]

S-A, you stroke your way and I'll stroke mine.