Cleaning Room wearing a jockstrap

[deusex]

Ok, I'm going to start this new forum off with this fun video I found. I love the fact it's not obvious and a bit voyeuristic.

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0vYtI2muF9s"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0vYtI2muF9s" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

[The Bondsman]

Yeah, ...haven't seen so much "plumber's crack" since I had my sink fixed!
But I'm wondering if it's impossible for guys now to buy/wear jeans that actually FIT 'em in the arse anymore?
Is there any sadder sight than that saggy, droopy empty sack hanging down at the back?
What ever happened to a tight, firm butt clearly defined by a pair of well-fitted jeans?
Guaranteed to get my temperature rising!

[SweatyAussie]

What I said

[SweatyAussie]

Yeah, ...haven't seen so much "plumber's crack" since I had my sink fixed!
But I'm wondering if it's impossible for guys now to buy/wear jeans that actually FIT 'em in the arse anymore?
Is there any sadder sight than that saggy, droopy empty sack hanging down at the back?
What ever happened to a tight, firm butt clearly defined by a pair of well-fitted jeans?
Guaranteed to get my temperature rising!
If Bondsman was a member of my jeans site he would have seen lots and lots of discussion of this very point. 99% of the comments say the same thing - baggy jeans are crap - but I guess the guys who wear saggers are mainly not the guys who join a jeans site. The focus of such a site is the sexual appeal of jeans on a guy - and that more or less means TIGHT jeans.
I could go on and on about this, but this is not a jeans site. Anyone who is interested enough should take a look at the site in question:
http://www.justusguysintojeans.com
and my ID there is jeansGuyOZ.

[The Bondsman]

Sorry I'm not a member SweatyAussie, ......maybe I should rectify that, .....but as a dedicated lover of the firm curves of a piece of prime male arse, it really pisses me off to see guys completely camouflaging their best asset with crappy saggy baggy falling down to the knees jeans, where you can't even discern if they actually have an arse, let alone the shape of it.
Even if they are str8, they certainly should be aware that in all surveys of women, it was found that the butt (sic.for all you Yanks), was voted the most sexy part of the male body for women.
I suppose it would be a bit like women totally covering up and hiding their breasts, ......if I was str8 and cared anything about breasts, that is!
Jeans do not necessarily have to be skin tight all over, just cut to fit in the rear.
From what I have read of the history of jeans, ...and SweatyAussie will obviously be far more informed here than I am, ...they were originally cut
tight across the arse to enable them to stay up without the use of a belt or braces.
If I am correct in my assumption that jeans became popular with the Californian goldminers, they certainly wouldn't have wanted to be exposing their arse-cracks when bending over panning on the goldfields, ....there were a lot of sex-starved blokes out there! :D
A man could soon find himself "ass-ayed" real quick, ... so to speak! :D ;)

[SweatyAussie]

All correct. I have not worn a belt with jeans for many years. However, a recent purchase of Levis "Tuff" skinny leg jeans has necessitated the wearing of a belt to keep them up nice and tight.
The jeans are otherwise pretty nice so I was prepared to give low rise a go... but in my opinion God put the hipbone where it is for a reason, why not take advantage of it and wear your jeans tight and above the hips so they stay up with no hassles?