Getting Hot In My Boxers!

[johnnyo711]

Playing Around In My Boxers!

[eggwhite]

got me hot for you

[johnnyo711]

Getting hot in my new Tommy White Boxers!

[AZTanDan]

Perhaps it's just me, but there is absolutely nothing that a pair of boxers does for me. Now boxer briefs is another thing altogether. I like something that shows some definition of what is to be beheld or beholden, or both! :D

My other problem with boxers is how they tend to show up below shorts at inopportune times and how things tend to flop in an out uncontrollably. Hence I prefer something a little more body conforming and white (thats for Bonds). :D

[Twain]

Those shots got me hot. To me boxers are simply more masculine.

[The Bondsman]

Hence I prefer something a little more body conforming and white (thats for Bonds). :D
Who thanks you profusely for saying it, ....actually I totally concur with your thoughts on boxers, but everybody knows that by now!
To me boxers are simply more masculine.
Oh I do hate open-ended statements! :mad:
More masculine that what, may one ask???? :confused:
More masculine than lacy BodyAware g-strings? OK, .....granted.
More masculine than than white classic well-fitted men's briefs?
I would have to seriously argue the point with you on that!
Boxers show nothing at all, no bulge, no fine line of the glutes, just unnecessary volumes of cloth. They come in the most vile lurid patterns, or doddery grandfather little prints/stripes and vomitous colours, not to mention the jokey slogan variety which should be totally annihilated on sight!
Particularly those that have any form of sexual innuendo relating to dick-size or prowess whatsoever, ....and those Valentine's Day crappy heart covered ones that vapid girls buy their poor deluded boyfriends! :eek: :mad:

Boxers don't really do anything for the male anatomy other than preventing .....ahem, ..."skiddies" (yuk), on the trousers of those blokes too incompetent or lazy to even keep their own arses clean. :eek: :moon :eek:
They offer no support whatsoever, let your balls stick to your legs in hot weather, ...that's VERY uncomfortable, ....and things are never found where you left 'em!
Now did I leave anything out? Oh yeah, they remind me of circus clown pants, .....only with much less sexual allure!
Here in Oz, I am pleased to report, they are now the sole preserve of trailer-trash only. All the young blokes have moved on to something more stylish, .....and openly make fun of any sightings of boxers now as "old-fashioned" and out of touch.
"Oh look, he's still wearing boxers!"
As I said above, ....I'm not a fan.......but to show that The Bondsman is a tolerant and all-encompassing person, I have even included a "boxer pic" (sorry, but they had to be white!), in my gallery. Don't get any ideas now, ...it's just to demonstrate what compassion and acceptance I have for people who are stuck in ridiculous fetishes....! :eek: ;) ;) :D

[Twain]

Bondy, I think you're bound up in elastic leg openings and aboundently tight waist bands. True, briefs and bb's form to the male shape better. But the surprise and prize that lay within the boxers may be well worth the time to unwrap it.
I've never met a briefs waistband that didn't try to choke me. Leg openings? More accurately leg closings. They continually breed dreaded jock itch for me. (You might say I have hot balls, and you'd be right.) The air I get from looser legs helps.
What appears masculine is subjective--I know my opinion is in the minority. The look of manhood coming out of plaid boxers turns me on.
I am reluctant to engage in a battle of wits with you, feeling about half equiped. I do admire your occasional satirical thrust on this board. Not that I would object to your other thrust, should partners and geography allow.
Thanks for the reply and the challenge to think about what moves me.

[The Bondsman]

I've never met a briefs waistband that didn't try to choke me.
Are you sure you're wearing them correctly Twain?
Do you just like to wear your briefs up that high, or did someone give you an "atomic-wedgie" ? :rolleyes: :D :D :D

[Twain]

Bondy, you know my description of the too tight tightie whities was rhetorical embellishment, somewhat like a briefs boy stuffing a sock in his.
An impossible task in boxers. Thus boxers are more truthful.

[The Bondsman]

Thus boxers are more truthful.
An interesting "ergo" no doubt.
On that same line of reasoning, total nudity would have to be "more truthful", if that's the objective. (Just don't get me started on those infidel "free-ballers! Spit, retch, ....gag!)
Which got me to thinking "truth" per se. seems to have absolutely NO part whatsoever anymore in modern underwear. Just look at all the built-in cock-rings, so called "shelf-technology" and "enhancing" bloody swimwear and underwear! :rolleyes:
Doesn't anyone do just plain old "lunch" anymore?
Does even this last bastion of a man's pride have to be strangled, stretched and cajoled to push forward and upwards with the maximum possible thrust usually reserved for a Saturn rocket???
In the Post-Feminist landscape, are men now starting to adopt areas of anxiety that were once the sole preserve of women? :confused:
I can remember when you saw a bloke "packing lunch" you could be pretty sure he was the lucky possessor of the somewhat larger example of male genitalia, .....AND it would have hair where men should have hair too.
Now, ....if the pursuit of "size" is your shallow whim, upon bedding such a prize, and removing his undergarment, you'll probably find most of his impressive "size" goes with it, ...or there's this poor restricted little "molehill" of a dick being tortured up into a "mountain" impersonation with the Inquisition-like aid of about four cock-rings, a lift belt and a Dore or Koala "display suit" or some such!
AND you'll also need to check an ID card to make sure you're NOT committing an act of paedophilia if you were intending to go by any secondary male sexual characteristics to guess the age of your prospective partner!!!
Good luck to all size-queens out there! Your quest just got SO much harder, ...pun fully intended! :rolleyes: :D

[johnnyo711]

and I was just trying to get hot in my boxers!

[johnnyo711]

Maybe this will keep everyone happy! You pick!!

[The Bondsman]

Maybe this will keep everyone happy!
If you're going to tell me you actually wore those for Xmas, then I'm sending the style police around IMMEDIATELY! :eek:
The only "pricks" I want to see in underwear, and yes, that includes even boxers, do NOT come on holly! :rolleyes:
Thankfully, they did not feature that other favourite Yule botanical specimen, ....with a slogan "Kiss me under the mistletoe!" :eek: :rolleyes:
The white briefs, are of course a welcome relief for the eyes, .....and a white Xmas in those woud be infinitely preferable.
Just remember, all holly should be DOWN before the 6th December, or it's VERY bad luck for the year! :D :D

[AZTanDan]

While the brief display of the briefer white garment was enjoyed, the Boxer still destroys the moment.

I feel that if one must wear a garment that covers some of the leg, then let it be a pair of bike shorts with (or without) a jock on underneath. Run with a pair of these on and you'll fell freedom and get looks that you never thought possible (which is one of my favorite passtimes) :D

Why you may ask? :confused: Simple, the equipment is constantly out in front, it requires frequent repacking, and (best of all) it garners the attention of both the admirer, and the puritanical right wing fascist who requires their daily dose of being shocked, which I am only too happy to deliver. :D

Let's see you accomplish that in some confounded boxers or those hideously oversized "basketball" or bored shorts. :mad:

I know your going to be saying that the Boxers aren't worn outside while working out, running, or walking, which is my point exactly. If you wouldn't dare wear them so that they were visible to everyone, then why would you want to wear them at all? :confused:

[Twain]

Do you wear your tightie whities out in your runs? If you don't exclude them for that reason, why exclude boxers?
You have your preferences, I have explained mine. Why do you sound like you need converts? I don't know if you're on the other underewear board, Underwear4men.com. But if you are or visit as a guest, Bike Dude has great explanations why he likes to see guys running in boxers--and he changed from briefs.

[AZTanDan]

You asked, I answered. :o
You countered, I answered. :(
You then added something brief, I answered. :mad:
If you don't like my opinion and answers then stop asking questions where the answer is unchanged! :confused:

You like your boxers... Fine, more power to you. I know where you stand, and hopefully you have figured out my opinion... Next subject please!

[The Bondsman]

Bike Dude has great explanations why he likes to see guys running in boxers--and he changed from briefs.
Well he may like SEEING "guys" running in boxers, ...but unless they're running in VERY cold weather, it's probably going to be a bit painful for those same blokes floppin' about.
Good eye-candy? Perhaps, .......advisable? NO!

[Jenniapse]

Its not long into my first experiment and it looks like the north pole is getting a little too warm....

k that isnt working what do i have to put between the img bits to show the saved image?

[superLouis]

:bath dit ben ik :blowme

[superLouis]

:bath That's me